User talk:themindset

Hi! Welcome to my talk page.

Please read these policies before posting.

Always sign your messages with ~~~~. Please do not post if you are not going to do this.
Please do not respond to other people's messages here. This has the effect of spilling disputes from other pages onto my talk page, and it is very distracting for me. This talk page is for messages to me, not to the other people who have written here.
Please create a new heading for new subjects. To respond to a message under the same subject, find the applicable heading below, press the "Edit" button on the right, and add your message to that section.
Responses will go to your talk page. If you reply to me on your own talk page - I will probably never see it; since I do not monitor every single usertalk page I comment on.

Click here to leave me a new message. Also, please remember to always sign your messages with ~~~~

help on article listed for deletion Blu mar ten

Hello, I noticed you saved the article on Good Looking Records from speedy deletion. Any chance you could leave a small comment on the article on GLR artist Blu mar ten?

Sorry I don't have a user page any more. I quit working seriously on wikipedia due to work commitments, I'm not a spam editor though, rest assured. Neither am I the artist or the article creator. Thanks again . 98.26.113.150 (talk) 05:36, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your Opinion Please?

Hello, can you take a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christine_breese and put in your vote to keep or delete, I am rather outnumbered by some non-spiritual people, could use someone who has a co-operative energy to look into the matter on a spiritual teacher article. Also please look into another article that was deleted that has been there for years at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_metaphysical_sciences but was deleted by a user as soon as I linked to it. Thanx (SpiritBeing (talk) 08:54, 16 July 2008 (UTC)SpiritBeing)[reply]

My Talk Archives

Archive1 - 28 April 2005 to 17 June 2006

Archive2 - 17 June 2006 to October 10 2006

No harm done

Don't mention it. · j e r s y k o talk · 22:12, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Thank you for supporting my RfA, and for simultaneously providing a laugh with your comment!

Atlant 12:53, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's been a week now that I've been an administrator and I'd like to take this moment to once again thank everyone who supported my RfA, and to let you all know that I don't think I've screwed anything up yet so I hope I'm living up to everyone's expectations for me. But if I ever fall short of those expectations, I'd certainly welcome folks telling me about it!

Atlant 14:26, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gary Kirk's RfA

Dear Themindset

Thank you very much for voting in my request for adminship. In the end, not many people let their opinion be known, and I didn't get the mop just yet. I have already begun acting on the issues brought up by the community, and will continue to do so. If you have any more suggestions for me, feel free to let me know.
Once again, thank you.
— Gary Kirk // talk! 12:59, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks

Thank you very much for your support in my RfA, which passed on October 17, 2006 with a tally of 53/6/0. I am equally elated and humbled by my new capacity as administrator of Wikipedia, and I send my heartfelt thanks for your unflinching support. If you need me for anything, just ask me! With gratitude, ²¹⁰physicq (c) 04:04, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA thanks

Hi, Themindset! Thank you for supporting me in my RfA, which succeeded with a final tally of 75/0/1! I hope I can live up to the standards of adminship, and I will try my best to make Wikipedia a better place. Feel free to send me a message if you need any assistance. :)

--Core des at 16:28, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Announcement: It's an administrator!

Themindset, thanks for your support on my request for adminship.

The final outcome was a robust 62/1/1, so I am now an administrator. If you ever have any questions about my actions, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Thanks again, Chris Griswold

Thank you

My administratorship candidacy succeeded with a final tally of 81/0/1. I appreciate your support. Results are at Wikipedia:Recently_created_admins#Durova. Warmly, Durova 21:23, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RFA/Cynical

Thank you for contributing to my RFA. Unfortunately it failed (final tally 26/17/3). As a result of the concerns raised in my RFA, I intend to undergo coaching, get involved in the welcoming committee and try to further improve the quality of my contributions to AFD and RFA. All the best. Cynical 14:58, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:Themindset/RFA

Hi themindset. I noticed in your rfa criteria that you've seen "many users show up and rack up 3500 edits in under a month, and then vanish." You have me interested, because I've certainly never seen any. So out of curiousity, could you point to some of these users? Thanks. Picaroon9288 02:30, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Hey themindset,

I just wanted to thank you for your support in my recent request for adminship, which passed unanimously with a final tally of 38/0/0. I appreciate your trust, and will do my best to uphold it. Don't hesitate to let me know if you ever need anything. — TKD::Talk 05:30, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talk archives

Hello. I stumbled upon your talk page. I wasn't sure if you were interested or not but you can put your archives in an Archive Box ({{archive box}}) like on my talk page. It makes it look a little nicer. AndreniW 04:22, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

I've finally had the time squeezed in during my long Wikibreak to thank the voters and commenters on my my RfA last month, and I thank you! I'll try again as previously planned in spring, in the time period between my high school graduation and enrollment in a university. This time, I'll have time to "prepare" (and not be on Wikibreak next time). Hopefully I'll win it easily. I'll be back to the Wikipedia soon, visting xfD everyday in addition. I was glad to see that you wrote a bit on why you were neutral on my nomination, unlike many on the page. What exactly is enough experience for you, in an RfA? Do you have any tips or suggestions for me on being a good Wikipedian or administrator? Thanks again, X [Mac Davis] (SUPERDESK|Help me improve)08:40, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

One Question

Could I ask you about this edit? If you notice, it wasn't me, but Radiant! who added the historical tag, almost a week ago. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk) 00:10, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image replaced

Hi, I've listed your image Image:2+2.png for deletion as it's been replaced by a vector version, Image:2+2.svg. Just wanted to inform you – hope this is OK. Happy editings, –Mysid ^(t) 12:50, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion

I believe you are confusing me for somebody else. I have not recently (or indeed, to my best recall, ever) deleted any standards page. >Radiant< 15:15, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your concern, but I believe that when a page is considered for deletion, rewriting or improving it is a good idea. Many pages on e.g. AFD are "saved" by an editor who rewrites them to address the concerns of the community. >Radiant< 08:50, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

MfD on Admin Standards pages

Please see this deletion debate. Carcharoth 00:37, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Total science.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Total science.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Chowbok ☠ 20:01, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

game 6

Hi, thanks for pointing out the edit I botched up. I'm not sure what happened, my best guess is that a revert went wrong somehow. I did a lot of spell correction, anti vandalism etc around that time, and something must have gone wrong. Sorry for causing you extra work. Sander123 15:27, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Started a new wikiproject

I got a few people together and started a new Wikiproject regarding rave related subjects and material. You may wish to participate. Wikipedia:WikiProject Rave for more information and to join if your interested. ALKIVAR™ ☢ 13:38, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Section title

adding more stuff

Regarding AFD

Please understand that I attempt all my contributions In good faith. If you examine my contribs closely, you will see bad faith edits are not the pattern there. Please, assume good faith. Regards, Navou ^banter 04:17, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ask why

I have no idea, maybe so you would ask why. I changed it to redirect to Enron, that's where I meant to redirect it to. Edward 21:27, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Xfxlogov2.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Xfxlogov2.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 14:50, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

960p

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article 960p, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. - NYC JD (make a motion) 14:24, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:MDG Computers

Please do not make threats against other editors such as "Perhaps media coverage of your actions on wikipedia is what you're looking to accomplish?". While spamming is not OK, threatening spammers with vague threats of media coverage is not the way to solve disputes. -Wo o ty Woot? contribs 04:09, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Baseballstars.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Baseballstars.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:12, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD - Lunds ASK

Since you commented on the first AfD you may wish to comment on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lunds ASK (2nd nomination). Please note: I am alerting all editors on both sides of the argument last time per Wikipedia policy. BlueValour 23:02, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:7800gt.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:7800gt.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rette tast 22:21, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:7800gt.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:7800gt.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 08:33, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CVU status

The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 16:28, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Chessgames.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Chessgames.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Chris B • talk 15:19, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ChessGames.com

An editor requested the speedy deletion of this article. I've declined as I don't think it met the relevant speedy deletion criteria. However without non-trivial coverage from third party sources, I'm not sure its an appropriate topic for Wikipedia. I've raised the matter for further input - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ChessGames.com - you may wish to contribute to that discussion and/or expand the article's references. WjBscribe 09:47, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maldini_and_Vegas.jpg

I have tagged Image:Maldini_and_Vegas.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 13:48, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect of Old saw

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Old saw, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Old saw is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Old saw, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 18:31, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Vancouver

You are receiveing this message because your name appears on the WikiProject Vancouver registration list but not on the Members list. The WikiProject Vancouver is currently having a roll-call; if you are still interested in participating, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Vancouver/Members and place your name in alphabetically. Also the WikiProject is currently discussing some proposed changes on the talk page. Thank you for your time. Mkdw ^talk 08:57, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE: 129.82.42.150

Hello Themindset. I saw your comment at Talk:Cannibal Holocaust, in which you requested the block of user 129.82.42.150. I don't know if you know this already, but you can report vandals and trolls at WP:AIV. An entry on that page will quickly draw the attention of an admin. Cheers, Face 22:09, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vancouver Meetup Invite

Regards, Mkdw ^talk 22:28, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kasparov (diskjockey)

You deleted the article around 18 october 2007. You say he doesn't meet "requirements" of Wikipedia. If I go along with this and look at those requirements, it seems that Kasparov meets the number 5 and 11 criteria. Look at this site. Oh yeah, how is the article original research? fucking onzin. Mallerd (talk) 08:50, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Encyclopaedic?

My edits have been informative. Moneris is within its legal rights to press the fine print of its agreements. I only hope to be able to let potential customers know of this. To me, it is a loophole that Moneris should not allow. Unlike a similar stipulation in cell phone accounts, for instance, there is no overhead (equipment or otherwise) for Moneris to excuse this charge. I have never come across a mid-size or large corporation which blatantly enforces egregious charges against its customers as Moneris does as a matter of course. I had a telephone agreement that there would be no charge like this, but subsequent to my cancellation of the account, Moneris refused to honor that, and refused to return the money. That information, true and not disputed, about the company needs be cancelled from Wikipedia seems biased. The term "encyclopaedic" is your way of taking what you see as the "high ground". I see it as a term used to white wash. I will find other venues to let the facts out where you deny them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.183.219.142 (talk) 19:16, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Djsharkey.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Djsharkey.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 08:09, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA reassessment of Drum and bass

I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. I have found a large number of concerns which you can see at Talk:Drum and bass/GA1, and consequently have de-listed the article. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:02, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Allegra Denton

A tag has been placed on Allegra Denton requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Irbisgreif (talk) 19:06, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Themindset. You have new messages at Irbisgreif's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Irbisgreif (talk) 19:17, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Themindset. You have new messages at Irbisgreif's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Irbisgreif (talk) 19:38, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Themindset! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 2 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Yann Danis - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:56, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of AG Neovo

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on AG Neovo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ΔT _{^{The only constant}} 05:18, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Manon Massé

The article Manon Massé has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. TexasAndroid (talk) 20:43, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chessgames.com for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chessgames.com is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chessgames.com until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Esquivalience ^t 03:07, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jungle music for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jungle music is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jungle music until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:39, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Themindset. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Themindset. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:MountPleasant-map.gif

The file File:MountPleasant-map.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned map.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 20:24, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Themindset. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Extended Video Graphics Array

The article Extended Video Graphics Array has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable, violates WP:NOTMANUAL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DannyS712 (talk) 05:13, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Henry VI or Henry VII listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Henry VI or Henry VII. Since you had some involvement with the Henry VI or Henry VII redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Certes (talk) 15:15, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Battle of 1812" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Battle of 1812. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 18#Battle of 1812 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm _Bacon 16:05, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tagar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tagar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tagar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 21:39, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tagar.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tagar.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:44, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Doppelganger Week for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Doppelganger Week is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doppelganger Week until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Belbury (talk) 09:50, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]